Jockstrap Headquarters » Jock Straps » Turning on people
Turning on people
Question:
You may wonder why I turned on m (gravity) and called him shallow and superficial (or there again you may not!) but this was due to the denial of what is called a *universal truth* or *universal law*. No one has the *right* to have kicks. But the vulnerable, weak and helpless have a *right* to be protected. If there is a substance (say a drug) which gives a certain percentage of the population a high, or kicks BUT at the same time, a few people are driven to insanity and torment by this substance – then the Universal Law states that it is those who are driven to insanity that must be protected and they do not side with the majority’s *right* to have kicks. By stating that he considered his right to have kicks was stronger than the Law of protecting the vulnerable, m (gravity) proved to us that he was shallow and superficial and does not know the basics.
Response:
"Soul Doubt" <n…@nowhere.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HGK7e.113$2X2.59@okepread06… > Hi Michelle, at least you have a soul, 
> I doubt that I have one. > It is nice that Damo seems to think I do, but I cannot agree. > I have transgressed into areas I should not have ventured. Asked WHY too > many times for my own good. > I believe I have a brain and this brain creates a series of perceptions > which I can cummulatively call consciousness. But a soul, I just don’t
get What is that I that perceives that ?! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> it. Never have. Don’t seem to have one, unless of course there is > reincarnation. Then I may have a soul, but I think it is JFK’s, and he can > have it back. > jerasmus
Response:
When the Motorcycle Helmet Laws were first appearing the argument went that the number of vegatables living on state provided room,board, and medical support justified making helmets mandatory. Of course if I just prefer not wearing a helmet, thats too bad. I have to be socially responsible and not become a vegatable. This may seem like the end of the story but its not. These days they add up the lost work time due to colds, skating mishaps, boating mshaps and etc. Then, for example, they try to pass laws mandating elbow, knee, and head protection must be worn if you put on a pair of skates. This is because of "school days lost" due to kids whacking their elbow in a fall. "Lost school days" due to skating accidents? So now protective gear is mandated for all? They won’t allow you to put glass in a screen door. It has to be plexiglass. Thats because if the door should slam the glass will break. All restaurants, under state law, must have these pastic tubes fit over their flourescent lights. Why? Because if the bulb should break the glass will fall into the food. Anybody follow this? If a glass thing breaks and falls into the food the restraunteur will feed it to people anyway? I agree that there are dangerous things and there is a need to regulate dangerous things. But………..the body politic can be really wierd at times. I support the motorcycle helmet laws. I’m sure that jock straps are useful for all school sports, I guess, but I would be curious to see the study that mandated jock straps for school atheletics. I was in sixth grade when I had to wear a jock strap for playing basketball in a little kids league. At first I thought it was some kind of protective hat…….
Response:
"hood" <h…@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:mQG7e.3481$WP4.3332@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net… > No one has the *right* to have kicks. But the vulnerable, weak and > helpless > have a *right* to be protected.
If you were a six-foot rugby star, with perfect physical health, no mental problems of any kind, and loads of money to spend on anything you wanted, would you still feel this way? -:(TT):-
Response:
"Turbo Turnip" <veg…@garden.xx> wrote in message
news:115v2jip50oae59@corp.supernews.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> "hood" <h…@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:mQG7e.3481$WP4.3332@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net… >> No one has the *right* to have kicks. But the vulnerable, weak and >> helpless >> have a *right* to be protected. > If you were a six-foot rugby star, with perfect physical health, no mental > problems of any kind, and loads of money to spend on anything you wanted, > would you still feel this way? > -:(TT):-
Response:
"Turbo Turnip" <veg…@garden.xx> wrote in message
news:115v2jip50oae59@corp.supernews.com… > "hood" <h…@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:mQG7e.3481$WP4.3332@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net… > > No one has the *right* to have kicks. But the vulnerable, weak and > > helpless > > have a *right* to be protected. > If you were a six-foot rugby star, with perfect physical health, no mental > problems of any kind, and loads of money to spend on anything you wanted, > would you still feel this way?
Yes, it is called compassion.
Response:
"Too much is never enough!" —MTV 1985
Response:
Hi Michelle, at least you have a soul, I doubt that I have one. It is nice that Damo seems to think I do, but I cannot agree. I have transgressed into areas I should not have ventured. Asked WHY too many times for my own good. I believe I have a brain and this brain creates a series of perceptions which I can cummulatively call consciousness. But a soul, I just don’t get it. Never have. Don’t seem to have one, unless of course there is reincarnation. Then I may have a soul, but I think it is JFK’s, and he can have it back. jerasmus